test# WARNING: head commit changed in the meantime
test
This commit is contained in:
parent
94e6c4b293
commit
250d364bfc
12
rules.go
12
rules.go
@ -98,13 +98,13 @@ func resetMsgParsingRules() {
|
||||
,(5000, ` + strconv.Itoa(objSubTypeMessageStockReq) + `, "Stock Req", "^/stock$")
|
||||
,(5000, ` + strconv.Itoa(objSubTypeMessageMiscReq) + `, "Misc Req", "^/misc$")
|
||||
,(5000, ` + strconv.Itoa(objSubTypeMessageUnionWar) + `, "Union war report", "^(🏠Trade union news:\\n){0,1}` +
|
||||
`(((?P<Union>[A-Z][a-z]+ [A-Z][a-z]+) was (?P<Status>(easily defended|defended successfully|breached.|easily breached.|closely breached.))(Attackers have pillage union for (?<Loot>[0-9]+) stock):\\n` +
|
||||
`(🎖Attack leaders: (?P<AtkCastle1>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser1>[^,]+)(,(?P<AtkCastle2>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser2>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<AtkCastle3>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser3>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<AtkCastle4>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser4>[^,]+)){0,1}){0,1}(\\n){0,1}` +
|
||||
`(🎖Defense leaders: (?P<DefCastle1>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefUser1>[^,]+)(,(?P<DefCastle2>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser2>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<DefCastle3>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefUser3>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<DefCastle4>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser4>[^,]+)){0,1}){0,1}(\\n){0,1})(\\n)*)*` +
|
||||
`(((?P<Union>[A-Z][a-z]+ [A-Z][a-z]+) was (?P<StatusUnion>(easily defended|defended successfully|breached.|easily breached.|closely breached.))(Attackers have pillage union for (?<Loot>[0-9]+) stock):\\n` +
|
||||
`(🎖Attack leaders: (?P<AtkUnionCastle1>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUnionUser1>[^,]+)(,(?P<AtkUnionCastle2>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUnionUser2>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<AtkUnionCastle3>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUnionUser3>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<AtkUnionCastle4>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUnionUser4>[^,]+)){0,1}){0,1}(\\n){0,1}` +
|
||||
`(🎖Defense leaders: (?P<DefUnionCastle1>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefUnionUser1>[^,]+)(,(?P<DefUnionCastle2>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefUnionUser2>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<DefUnionCastle3>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefUnionUser3>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<DefUnionCastle4>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefUnionUser4>[^,]+)){0,1}){0,1}(\\n){0,1})(\\n)*)*` +
|
||||
`(🎪State of exclusive rights:\\n){0,1}` +
|
||||
`(((?P<Fair>[A-Z][a-z]+ [A-Z][a-z]+) (?P<Status>(was protected|belongs to)( (?P<Attacker>[A-Z][a-z]+ [A-Z][a-z]+):)\\n` +
|
||||
`(🎖Attack leaders: (?P<AtkCastle1>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser1>[^,]+)(,(?P<AtkCastle2>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser2>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<AtkCastle3>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser3>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<AtkCastle4>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser4>[^,]+)){0,1}){0,1}(\\n){0,1}` +
|
||||
`(🎖Defense leaders: (?P<DefCastle1>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefUser1>[^,]+)(,(?P<DefCastle2>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser2>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<DefCastle3>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefUser3>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<DefCastle4>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkUser4>[^,]+)){0,1}){0,1}(\\n){0,1})(\\n)*)*` +
|
||||
`(((?P<Fair>[A-Z][a-z]+ [A-Z][a-z]+) (?P<StatusFair>(was protected|belongs to)( (?P<Attacker>[A-Z][a-z]+ [A-Z][a-z]+):)\\n` +
|
||||
`(🎖Attack leaders: (?P<AtkFairCastle1>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkFairUser1>[^,]+)(,(?P<AtkFairCastle2>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkFairUser2>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<AtkFairCastle3>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkFairUser3>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<AtkFairCastle4>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<AtkFairUser4>[^,]+)){0,1}){0,1}(\\n){0,1}` +
|
||||
`(🎖Defense leaders: (?P<DefFairCastle1>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefFairUser1>[^,]+)(,(?P<DefFairCastle2>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefFairUser2>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<DefFairCastle3>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefFairUser3>[^,]+)){0,1}(,(?P<DefFairCastle4>[🐉🦅🐺🦈🦌🥔🌑])(?P<DefFairUser4>[^,]+)){0,1}){0,1}(\\n){0,1})(\\n)*)*` +
|
||||
`$)")
|
||||
;`)
|
||||
failOnError(err, "resetMsgParsingRules : populate table msg_rules")
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user